News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Pro Comp Custom's 1970 Charger from SEMA

Started by JR, November 20, 2016, 01:17:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

JR

Well, SEMA came and went with no mention of this car on here, so I thought I'd share. It's a radically modified 70 Charger 500 with a 745 horse NASCAR engine, and the bodywork has been heavily modified. The roof was chopped, and some other radical metalwork was done.

Normally I draw the line and changing/modifying sheet metal, but this is a pretty cohesive build.

Love it or hate it, here it is.



































http://www.procompcustom.com/1970-charger.html

https://m.facebook.com/motorplicity/photos/pcb.334044540302876/334044196969577/?type=3&source=48
70 Charger RT top bananna /68 Charger RT triple green

Kern Dog

I do like the front valance. It fits tighter around the bumper. The section work on the body is not immediately noticeable until looking at the stock and modified doors side by side.

DAY CLONA

One of those builds where a lot of close attention to detail and work was performed, unfortunately those involved forgot to take a step back and realize the abomination they had created, one man's opinion...

Fitz73Chrgr

I saw that on Mike Finnegan's Instagram.  Not a fan of custom bodywork on Chargers.  Dodge got it right back in 1968, no need to "improve".
'73 Charger - project                '70 Charger - driver                 '66 Charger - survivor

Resto thread:
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,89803.msg1019541.html#msg1019541

Lennard


DAY CLONA

Quote from: Lennard on November 20, 2016, 03:02:07 PM
A body chop. Why? :rotz:



Agreed, the 2nd gen Chargers lines and proportions are near "perfect", very little to be improved on....now had this been a 71-4 Charger, then a sectioning of the body would have been an improvement over that 2 liter Coke bottle design

Homerr

10/10 Workmanship
2/10  Design
0/10  Destroying a Charger*
======
0/10  Overall


* Anything times 0 = 0

68 charger freak

all that custom work and they couldn't get the body lines straight! lots of details were overlooked on this one ...looks like a rush job for sema.having said that it has some interesting designs
68 charger, pro touring build ,mini tub,528 wedge,magnum-xl 6 speed,rms alterkation,martz 4 link,moser 8.75,custom interior

Daytona R/T SE


tan top

nother one of these custom , second generation chargers , that have had un tolled hours of  time   money spent on them  , some clever fabrication  work , those guys have skills  :yesnod:     , interesting ideas   :scratchchin: :-\ ,   not for me though  :down:   still  each to their own  :cheers:

maybe its me  ! maybe its a age thing , most / nearly all  of these custom  second generation  chargers  , to me seemed to be designed with a miss match of parts & ideas ...  just like someone building a car with know idea what they are doing :shruggy:  examble  dry sump nascar motor  , with air bag suspension , & looking at the interior shot  , what looks to be space for a  TV in the dash .... seems like its what a 5 year old would draw or design on a computer game ... only needs rocket launchers & or  a flux capacitor , maybe both ....
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

alfaitalia

I quite like it even though it's not very pretty and I've seen one hell of a lot worst done to a B body. And let's face it it's hard to make the front of a 70 any uglier......so they just left that bit! Please don't hit me...least not in the face! Lol!
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

Laowho

Quote from: alfaitalia on November 20, 2016, 06:40:07 PM
And let's face it it's hard to make the front of a 70 any uglier......so they just left that bit! Please don't hit me...least not in the face! Lol!

::)

JB400

The front end seems to be the best part of this car.  The rest, not so much.

69rtse4spd

 Not for me, looks like a crack in the tig welding on the top rad hose connection. 

Mike DC


Heavy changes to the 2nd-gen shape = FAIL


Every.  Single.  Time.   For 50 years and counting. 


JB400

Quote from: Mike DC (formerly miked) on November 21, 2016, 01:18:12 AM

Heavy changes to the 2nd-gen shape = FAIL


Every.  Single.  Time.   For 50 years and counting. 


You like the factory race cars, don't cha?

RCCDrew

Overall, I like it. I like how the nose curves down to the front more than stock. I thought the section would make the car look too long, but I think it works. A Charger that sits as low as a Ferrari. The rear bumper is hideous. The RT scoops are shorter than I would like, but looks necessary on a sectioned car.
At least they didn't do 68 tail lights on a 70, or a Torino grille, or a Viper hood, or an LS!!!  I have seen all of the abominations and this isn't as bad.

billssuperbird

They do nice work. I had them repair the bottom of my doors. They were the only ones that could Match my lacquer paint job

cbrestorations


Mike DC

       
QuoteYou like the factory race cars, don't cha?

Not in the sense of styling alone. 

The C500s were not a styling improvement.  The wing cars would be ridiculed in this hobby if they had been somebody's backyard project and not a NASCAR thing.   

The aero cars were cool for being so uncompromising & fast but the stock bodies were prettier.  That's why the factory didn't start making aero cars as the standard design until they were forced into it by MPG rules over time. 

crj1968

Don't like the swoopy back end at all. Other than that it looks like another custom car

Stevearino

Changing the proportions of a gen 2 Charger is playing with fire. Both from the top and the sides it mimics the perfect female shape with a narrow waist and nice hips. The way it was originally styled is on the money in my opinion. Lower it, rake it,put some fat tires under it on some nice wheels. fiddle with the peripheral details if you wish but leave the perfection of those body proportions alone. Please.

TexasStroker

Some nice touches...

Would like to see the dash and console (interior really) in a completed stage.  Searched and only came up with this:

Founder, Amarillo Area Mopars
www.amarilloareamopars.com
Founder, Lone Star Mopars
www.lonestarmopars.com
Will set-up a regional Charger meet
Contact me for info!

Laowho

Quote from: Stevearino on November 21, 2016, 07:08:16 PM
Changing the proportions of a gen 2 Charger is playing with fire. Both from the top and the sides it mimics the perfect female shape with a narrow waist and nice hips. The way it was originally styled is on the money in my opinion. Lower it, rake it,put some fat tires under it on some nice wheels. fiddle with the peripheral details if you wish but leave the perfection of those body proportions alone. Please.

Dunno how I coulda missed it f/ right under my nose. That's 40 years worth of analysis and a Bodhi tree all in one.  :yesnod: