If DCX makes a Challenger Coupe and it is cool...

[RT DAVE]

...will all of you people complaining about the new charger stop (complaining)?   Just curious.   It seems to me that it would make better business sense to get a profitable four door on the market before introducing a two door but that's just me.     

[andy74]

and here we go................

[plum500]

So why should the Charger name get tossed to the lions? I don't understand the reasoning behind the assumption that a hot Challenger coupe will/should automatically make classic Charger fans happy. Yes it would be nice to see, but essentially dressing on the wound.

Though yes, I agree, it would seem to make better business sense to get a 4 door on the market first. But to say that in this case simply ignores primary argument -- the horse they actually produced as the 4 door.

[RT DAVE]

and here we go................

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

[RT DAVE]

So why should the Charger name get tossed to the lions? I don't understand the reasoning behind the assumption that a hot Challenger coupe will/should automatically make classic Charger fans happy. Yes it would be nice to see, but essentially dressing on the wound.

I'm trying to determine if it's the lack of a two door coupe (besides the Viper) or just the use of the charger name that's the real offense.  Based on your response, this won't make everything completely better.   

[Silver R/T]

im fine with just plum crazy 70 challenger they do not need to molest yet another classic muscle car name

[89MOPAR]

 The name Challenger was already put on a 4 cyl, rear drive car.  Also sold as the Plymouth Sapporo.....

[RD]

The name Challenger was already put on a 4 cyl, rear drive car.   Also sold as the Plymouth Sapporo.....

didnt make it right back then, nor shall it make it right in the future.  two wrongs dont make a right