F6 Daytona on Ebay XX29L9B386548

[tan top]

  


http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dodge-Daytona-/221984382456?forcerrptr=true&hash=item33af4cddf8:g:MhsAAOSwLN5WiI8L&item=221984382456

[tan top]

 

[tan top]

 

[tan top]

 

[tan top]

  

[tan top]

 
hmmmm    

[440]

Looks like a nice Daytona. The frond ride height is too high in my opinion though.

[hemi68charger]

Maybe he found a better one? Need to ask my buddy from North Carolina... Wait, there's someone here on the forum that works at Hendricks....  I remember when that was bought around the time Everham bought John's 4speed F6..

[WINGMAN]

  It has a lot of wrong and missing items. 1970 right exhaust manifold, no clock knob, headlight vacuum hose routing, fuel line, oil fill cap, no spare tire. But lets not be to picky. Nice overall. (Wingman)   Jay.

[Ghoste]

Very nice!  (had to get in before the green haters jump on it  )

[cdr]

Maybe he found a better one? Need to ask my buddy from North Carolina... Wait, there's someone here on the forum that works at Hendricks....  I remember when that was bought around the time Everham bought John's 4speed F6..

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,119713.0.html

[nascarxx29]

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=115306.0

[birdsandbees]

Interesting how it has the complete VIN on the engine. My '69 (Lynch Rd car) only has 9A230241 on it and my A833 4 speed has the complete VIN stamped on it WM21H9A230241, and I know where the car has been it's entire life (our family). Did they get stamped different, on different lines and / or facilities?

[Nwcharger]

Interesting how it has the complete VIN on the engine. My '69 (Lynch Rd car) only has 9A230241 on it and my A833 4 speed has the complete VIN stamped on it RM21H9A230241, and I know where the car has been it's entire life (our family). Did they get stamped different, on different lines and / or facilities?

It's possible. My c500 has the full vin on the block. I'll take a look at my Daytona block but I'm pretty sure it has the full vin as well.

[tan top]

 from 1969   ,  E series motors  had the last 8 digits of the vin stamped only   ,    a 69 C500  or a 68 built E series  motor ! would have a full vin on the block , besause of a 68 SPD

looks there is stuff going on with all vin stampings  motor & trans  & body   

[UFO]

Wrong broadcast sheet for this car. Or wrong picture added to ad.
Listing has it as a 4 spd automatic. Must be a prototype trans LOL

[Moparpoolman]

  Body numbers match each other but not the VIN???  Also, They are claiming it to be matching numbers motor!?!?  
Last time for sale here
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,115306.125.html
The seller posted"the owner  just found the full detail work up  from Galen.  after looking at the papers  he says  Trans is Org to the car.
Motor has been restamped,  other wise all the other parts on the car are org to the car. he has about 25 or 30 pages of
pictures and comments......."

[johntpr]

Interesting how it has the complete VIN on the engine. My '69 (Lynch Rd car) only has 9A230241 on it and my A833 4 speed has the complete VIN stamped on it RM21H9A230241, and I know where the car has been it's entire life (our family). Did they get stamped different, on different lines and / or facilities?

That engine stamp is different because it wasn't done by Chrysler !

[birdsandbees]

So the correct thing to do would be to get a grinder out and remove the stamping... maybe a 10" mill cutter.. 

[r4daytona]

Why would the trunk and rad stampings be the same (366548) but the vin say 386?  Was it just that the guy doing the stampings was lazy that day?

[tan top]

Why would the trunk and rad stampings be the same (366548) but the vin say 386?  Was it just that the guy doing the stampings was lazy that day?

yes wondered that too  , also the trans is stamped 0B386548   ,  0  as in 1970 F series  , should be 9B386548  , un less the trans has come from a 70 ! with the same sequential ?      

may be there is a innocent explanation  assembly line vin stamp guy , smoking too much pot  , or ...

[birdsandbees]

Hendrick might want to fire the "pit crew" on this one!

[Moparpoolman]

Hey Owner of XX29L9B400604
Found your build sheet !!  Hope you don't have to buy this car to get it.

[69hemidaytona]

Motor is definitely a restamp.

[birdsandbees]

Exactly and what I can't believe is Hendrick is that hard up for funds to "allude" the truth and make money. Engine isn't original and the "stamp monkey" was day dreaming when he restamped the trans as well ! The body stamps were probably a $1.10 / hr union worker that didn't care, but the drive train stamps are intentional!

[wyliemn71]

the sheet has been with the car for a long time, I only know this because it is the sheet for my car!!!

[tan top]

the sheet has been with the car for a long time, I only know this because it is the sheet for my car!!!

really , that's interesting  , small world !  ,  good you know where it is , have you tried contacting the seller ?  ...its of no use to him or that Daytona    

least you can copy & print a picture of it  , not the same thing I know  , but ,,,,

[C5X DAYTONA]

the sheet has been with the car for a long time, I only know this because it is the sheet for my car!!!

David Patik and his sister used to own 400604.     David just wrote me this--------We used to own 400604. It is F6, c6w, column automatic, center seat.
Original engine was gone; car had old 383.

[wyliemn71]

Yes David Patik used to own my car, I purchased from him many years ago when I was in my early twenties, a real barn find back in the day! have known about this car and the build sheet for a while and at the time the current owner was not willing to send it to me even after I sent him all my documentation of 400604 ownership. which included fender tag rubbing, vin tag rub and pictures of title in my name. I am just sick about this!!!

[wyliemn71]

years ago I was fortunate enough to be able to get a matching numbers motor back to another fellow mopar brother, all I asked in return was the same year, same condition RB block back and for him to take care of the shipping costs associated with the transaction. I thought that is what the hobby is really about, reuniting dreams!!!

[Redbird]

I don't think anyone owes you anything.

If you want it, offer him something he wants; the broadcast sheet to his car, parts or money.

I get that people want the broadcast sheet that originally came with their car, for the purity of the hobby, because it should be with the original car, because it makes the car worth a lot more, whatever.

Every car I see offered for sale makes a big deal about the documentation and the car being worth a lot more if it has it. Obviously it is a money issue. 

[Moparpoolman]

Yes David Patik used to own my car, I purchased from him many years ago when I was in my early twenties, a real barn find back in the day! have known about this car and the build sheet for a while and at the time the current owner was not willing to send it to me even after I sent him all my documentation of 400604 ownership. which included fender tag rubbing, vin tag rub and pictures of title in my name. I am just sick about this!!!

Maybe you'll have better luck with this owner.  It seems as though a member on here works for Hendricks, maybe he can help.
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,119713.0.html

[held1823]

edit - never mind, wrong car.

[birdsandbees]

Now you guys are mixing up cars!

[wyliemn71]

its not all about the money because ill probably never sell my car

[Beep Beep Dave]

Seems pretty sad that Rick Hendrick Motorsports won't give up your fender tag. I doubt that Rick himself would see such a request. I wouldn't give up that's for sure because if the car is sold who knows where it might go.

It would be nice if someone on here could help you out.

As for the car itself I really like the colour combo, it was nice of them to post up all the pics that they did. The pics do negatively affect the price but I wouldn't be a happy camper if I seen the car in person without all the pics. For the $50k or so that they are looking to make on the car I am surprised they are presenting it in the condition that they are. I think some time and effort at least under the hood would go a long way.

Dave

[wyliemn71]

I called Hendricks and talked with a nice gentleman and explained the situation. He said he would get back to me, just playing the waiting game now.... been a couple days but still holding out hope. I also sent stevearino a message.   

[Beep Beep Dave]

I would phone again on Monday as the auction is over. If the car gets sold you will have to try and track down the car again. Its too bad you can't talk to Rick personally although he might not even know anything about it. Keep trying and good luck.

Dave

[wyliemn71]

Yes Dave that is exactly my thoughts, I will call on Monday and if only I could talk with Rick and or Ray I do believe that would help, Thank you for the kind words.  P.S. love the pic of the 70 sublime Charger, only wish mine looked as nice as yours, pretty awesome car!!!

[superbird20]

Looks like GAA is going to auction this Daytona.  According to earlier post: motor is a restamp, wrong stamp on trans, rad support & trunk #'s don't match VIN.  Wrong build sheet.  Did wyliemn71 get this build sheet for his Daytona?

[nascarxx29]

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=119713.0

[nascarxx29]

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=115306.0

[AKcharger]

love the picture with the B-52!

[wyliemn71]

Well an update about the buildsheet that is correct for my car, I had a talk with some gentlemen at Hendricks, the sheet can be purchased, but im having a hard time with the asking price and ive learned the sheet is now laminated, (grr)... its not looking promising at this point in time to re-unite my car and the sheet.

[Sgt Superbird]

That just doesn't make sense to me, wyliemn71. A build sheet has really no value to anyone but the person with that property! How sad of a situation. If it were me, I'd feel good to reunite a sheet with a car. How cool is that and what a great "pay it forward" gesture that is! (Plus, it's the right thing to do.) It's only my opinion, but how can a person hold an item hostage that really isn't theirs? If we're getting the entire story, shame on you, Hendricks!