News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

difference in heads 906 vs 915 vs 452?

Started by Stegs, March 23, 2015, 10:28:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Stegs

what are the differences between, which is preferable?


Im having my 440 freshened up, they are going to call me and let me know what iron heads i have. being stock im going to have them port/polish them since new heads are not in the budget.

The car with a unknown history 440 seems to have tons of power, but i think a fresh 440 and some polished heads with a new intake should be a welcome improvement


So fill me in guys, what is good? bad? worse?

BLK 68 R/T

All 3 are good heads, you may also end up having casting #s 346 or 516 casting. I don't know to much about the latter 2 that I mentioned so someone else with more knowledge may chime in on them.

From what I have gathered reading about the 3 you mentioned.

915s are a closed chamber design, non hardened seats, good flow #s, should have a little higher compression due to the closed chamber design. I'm sure with some port/polish work they would be just as good or better than 906s. Note-these are a semi-rare head and unless you have an original 67 HP motor is unlikely these are the heads you have.
906s are an open chamber head, non hardened seats, standard head on all 68-70 big block engines, 71s as well??, can be made to flow really good with larger valves and port/polish work and hardened seats added.
452s are basically the same as 906s from my understanding with the exception of hardened seats already being installed.

Stegs

Quote from: BLK 68 R/T on March 23, 2015, 10:53:37 AM
All 3 are good heads, you may also end up having casting #s 346 or 516 casting. I don't know to much about the latter 2 that I mentioned so someone else with more knowledge may chime in on them.

From what I have gathered reading about the 3 you mentioned.

915s are a closed chamber design, non hardened seats, good flow #s, should have a little higher compression due to the closed chamber design. I'm sure with some port/polish work they would be just as good or better than 906s. Note-these are a semi-rare head and unless you have an original 67 HP motor is unlikely these are the heads you have.
906s are an open chamber head, non hardened seats, standard head on all 68-70 big block engines, 71s as well??, can be made to flow really good with larger valves and port/polish work and hardened seats added.
452s are basically the same as 906s from my understanding with the exception of hardened seats already being installed.

thank you

I will post what heads are on the car when he calls

Supposedly its a original 70 HP block

John_Kunkel


I remember one of the porting services stating they preferred the 452's.
Pardon me but my karma just ran over your dogma.

Challenger340

516, 1966 and earlier, Flat Port Floor, Closed Chamber, 2.08" Intake / 1.60" Exhaust
915, 1967 only, High Huber Hump Intake Port Floor, Closed Chamber, 2.08" Intake Valve / 1.60" Exhaust (low perf), 1.74" Exhaust on HP Engines
906, '68 to 1970, High Huber Hump Intake Port Floor, Open Chamber, 2.08" Intake Valve / 1.74"Exhaust (All)
902/346/452, 1971 & up, Low Port Floor W/swirl hump on siamesed inner Port wall(acts like a short turn), 2.08" Intake, 1.74" Exhaust(All)

from my studies...
Worst flowing to "Best" in stock 2.08"/ 1.74" Valve configuration to .450" Lift W/30* / 45* @ .039" /  60*@ .080* / 75* Throatcut,  and 30* Backcut on Valve
                                                                                                                   45* @ .065" Exhaust

Worst.... 516.... 902/346/452 series, but VERY close to 906/915 series.

Above .500" Lift with Portwork becomes a different story.
The 906/915 can still exceed the 902/346/452 series, but requires a far higher degree of Port Short Turn "FINESE" to get the curve right, and work to get the Bowl Volume above on the roof, especially with bigger 2.14"/ 1.81" Valves. !
Generally speaking,
above .500" Lift, and with bigger 2.14" / 1.81" Valves, it is far easier with less porting work to get better Flow out of the 902/346/452 series than the 906/915 series, even if it does just go crashing out the backside into the spark plug... Flow is Flow, more than one way to skin a cat.

The thing everyone needs to understand.... ALL THESE HEADS can support 500hp even with stock 2.08" Intake Valves and 1.74" Exhaust Valves, even the 516 Casting.
Only wimps wear Bowties !

Challenger340

Quote from: John_Kunkel on March 23, 2015, 01:28:18 PM

I remember one of the porting services stating they preferred the 452's.

Yep, I agree.....  the 902/346/452 series Heads are the easiest/cheapest/most cost effective to get the Flow.
But,
that is not to say MORE FLOW can't be had with the 906/915 series than the 902/346/452..... just takes ALOT more work to get there, that nobody wants to pay for nowadays ?
Only wimps wear Bowties !

BSB67

Quote from: Stegs on March 23, 2015, 10:28:36 AM
what are the differences between, which is preferable?


Im having my 440 freshened up, they are going to call me and let me know what iron heads i have. being stock im going to have them port/polish them since new heads are not in the budget.

The car with a unknown history 440 seems to have tons of power, but i think a fresh 440 and some polished heads with a new intake should be a welcome improvement


So fill me in guys, what is good? bad? worse?

Interesting.  If I had a running motor, and I wanted to get the most from it with the least $, I would put all of the money into the heads and leave the short block. :Twocents:

You should only port the heads after you have established that the heads are in good shape.  Other wise, It's pretty much a waste.  Not to be Debbie Downer, but it is unlikely they are in good condition.  To make a set of used factory heads good, comp valve grind, and porting, you will be at or over the cost for new aluminum replacements.

Be sure to get a compression distance from your machine shop.  This is critical information for any future head decisions you might make.

500" NA, Eddy head, pump gas, exhaust manifold with 2 1/2 exhaust with tailpipes
4150 lbs with driver, 3.23 gear, stock converter
11.68 @ 120.2 mph

Stegs

Quote from: BSB67 on March 23, 2015, 06:16:09 PM
Quote from: Stegs on March 23, 2015, 10:28:36 AM
what are the differences between, which is preferable?


Im having my 440 freshened up, they are going to call me and let me know what iron heads i have. being stock im going to have them port/polish them since new heads are not in the budget.

The car with a unknown history 440 seems to have tons of power, but i think a fresh 440 and some polished heads with a new intake should be a welcome improvement


So fill me in guys, what is good? bad? worse?

Interesting.  If I had a running motor, and I wanted to get the most from it with the least $, I would put all of the money into the heads and leave the short block. :Twocents:

You should only port the heads after you have established that the heads are in good shape.  Other wise, It's pretty much a waste.  Not to be Debbie Downer, but it is unlikely they are in good condition.  To make a set of used factory heads good, comp valve grind, and porting, you will be at or over the cost for new aluminum replacements.

Be sure to get a compression distance from your machine shop.  This is critical information for any future head decisions you might make.

the are going to freshen up the motor, basically a stock rebuild but with new rings/gaskets etc

Obviously they are going to degrease it, inspect it, reassemble and paint

while they have the heads off, they are going to harden the seats so i can properly run unleaded fuel

At that point they will give me a idea on port/polish

I figure if its true that factory heads can go up to 500hp, than a mild port/polish should only improve on a stock rebuilt 440 right?

Stegs

update for everybody

this is what they found on my car

7 month production

1969 block

906 heads

forged crank

he isnt sure on if its a HP block or not....but maybe you guys could help me out "how to determine that"


BLK 68 R/T

If it's an HP block it should be stamped HP in the flat raised pad on the top of the block by the front of the valley pan. Most got a pretty legible stamp but some are pretty faint so take a good look. It will also have other info stamped in the pad such as undersize or oversize bearings from the factory indicated by some sort of a symbol and year code represented by a specific letter, like D440 - which indicates 68 model year engine. Good luck with your build!

Stegs

update again

He is going to give the block a better look over for the HP stamp

He just fluxed my heads and they are in great shaep (what a relief)  :2thumbs:

something wierd tho he found

It had 4 original pistons, 2 were aftermarket replacement and 2 were "trw" old speed shot parts LOL

They are going to bore 30 over and do 8 matching pistons, do a port/polish on the 906s and bolt up my eddy intake

For the most part is a factory rebuild, but it should move really well now with some head work and eddy intake


:punkrocka: :nixon:

Challenger340

Quote from: Stegs on March 25, 2015, 08:40:09 AM
update again

He is going to give the block a better look over for the HP stamp

He just fluxed my heads and they are in great shaep (what a relief)  :2thumbs:

something wierd tho he found

It had 4 original pistons, 2 were aftermarket replacement and 2 were "trw" old speed shot parts LOL

They are going to bore 30 over and do 8 matching pistons, do a port/polish on the 906s and bolt up my eddy intake

For the most part is a factory rebuild, but it should move really well now with some head work and eddy intake


:punkrocka: :nixon:

Be very careful with replacement Piston selection, as it relates to the "Compression Distance" of the Pistons.
Do NOT select Pistons by "published" or "advertised" Compression ratio in Catalogs.....
rebuild the Heads FIRST,
then "CC" them for Volume when done, then apply THAT CC number with a known Head gasket like the Fel-Pro # 1009, etc. when selecting a conduscive piston "compression distance" height for your desired Compression Ratio WITH the Cam events to be used.
Only wimps wear Bowties !

Stegs

Quote from: Challenger340 on March 25, 2015, 09:45:02 AM
Quote from: Stegs on March 25, 2015, 08:40:09 AM
update again

He is going to give the block a better look over for the HP stamp

He just fluxed my heads and they are in great shaep (what a relief)  :2thumbs:

something wierd tho he found

It had 4 original pistons, 2 were aftermarket replacement and 2 were "trw" old speed shot parts LOL

They are going to bore 30 over and do 8 matching pistons, do a port/polish on the 906s and bolt up my eddy intake

For the most part is a factory rebuild, but it should move really well now with some head work and eddy intake


:punkrocka: :nixon:

Be very careful with replacement Piston selection, as it relates to the "Compression Distance" of the Pistons.
Do NOT select Pistons by "published" or "advertised" Compression ratio in Catalogs.....
rebuild the Heads FIRST,
then "CC" them for Volume when done, then apply THAT CC number with a known Head gasket like the Fel-Pro # 1009, etc. when selecting a conduscive piston "compression distance" height for your desired Compression Ratio WITH the Cam events to be used.


This company builds motors everyday. He is ordering the equivalent to oem specs.

he is a ford guy, but his best friend is a Road Runner guy....he said he knows these mopar 440s and 383s better than a 302 ford

he is ordering what he feels will be best, and from his knowledge .....Im not doubting it one bit.


heyoldguy

Please don't disregard Challenger340's advice on compression distance. Seems like OEM spec's changed from year to year. At the same time you should be able to trust your machinist. But a Ford guy who has a Mopar buddy sounds a little iffy to me.

His iron head information was exactly what I have experienced.

BSB67

Quote from: Stegs on March 25, 2015, 12:36:05 PM
Quote from: Challenger340 on March 25, 2015, 09:45:02 AM
Quote from: Stegs on March 25, 2015, 08:40:09 AM
update again

He is going to give the block a better look over for the HP stamp

He just fluxed my heads and they are in great shaep (what a relief)  :2thumbs:

something wierd tho he found

It had 4 original pistons, 2 were aftermarket replacement and 2 were "trw" old speed shot parts LOL

They are going to bore 30 over and do 8 matching pistons, do a port/polish on the 906s and bolt up my eddy intake

For the most part is a factory rebuild, but it should move really well now with some head work and eddy intake


:punkrocka: :nixon:

Be very careful with replacement Piston selection, as it relates to the "Compression Distance" of the Pistons.
Do NOT select Pistons by "published" or "advertised" Compression ratio in Catalogs.....
rebuild the Heads FIRST,
then "CC" them for Volume when done, then apply THAT CC number with a known Head gasket like the Fel-Pro # 1009, etc. when selecting a conduscive piston "compression distance" height for your desired Compression Ratio WITH the Cam events to be used.


This company builds motors everyday. He is ordering the equivalent to oem specs.

he is a ford guy, but his best friend is a Road Runner guy....he said he knows these mopar 440s and 383s better than a 302 ford

he is ordering what he feels will be best, and from his knowledge .....Im not doubting it one bit.


Well, you should.  If you choose to not be informed, you bare the responsibility for what he puts in it and how it runs.  This is the only time to get piston selection right.

Of the OEM equivalent pistons available today, only one is worth using.  Everything else is complete junk and a very poor choice for any performance rebuild.

I'm curious, what is his cost estimate for the rebuild?

500" NA, Eddy head, pump gas, exhaust manifold with 2 1/2 exhaust with tailpipes
4150 lbs with driver, 3.23 gear, stock converter
11.68 @ 120.2 mph

firefighter3931

Hopefully a Speedpro 2355 piston has been chosen for this build  :yesnod:



Ron
68 Charger R/T "Black Pig" Street/Strip bruiser, 70 Charger R/T 440-6bbl Cruiser. Firecore ignition  authorized dealer ; contact me with your needs

69wannabe

Quote from: firefighter3931 on March 25, 2015, 08:07:14 PM
Hopefully a Speedpro 2355 piston has been chosen for this build  :yesnod:



Ron

X2!!!! These are a good mid to high 9's in the compression range and a good replacement piston for a HP 440. These are what I had in my last 440 build and they worked very good. You want to see part numbers when he order's your piston's!! You don't want to wind up with the low compression flattop's that are offered too. 2266's is the low compression pistons I think and they are rated at 8.5 to 1 or something like that. It would be good to get him to make you a part's list so you can see what is being put into your engine build!!

Stegs

he told me what they are, i forgot.

he is matching pistons to the heads and doing a gasket matching

i think the pistons were something like 4283 (maybe a part number?) he told me but i have a bad memory and didnt right it down since i was driving


I know they are spec to oem pistons

total for the rebuild, using stock cam, crank, heads etc (port/polish heads), new cam bearings, new rings, gaskets, machine crank, bore the cylinders 30 over
new pistons, re-assemble and paint hemi orange was 2300

that also includes stuff like a new timing gear and chain, new oil pump (mellings) and im sure a bunch of other stuff that i forget.

The nice part about everything is this is only going to cost me about 400 out of my own pocket, the rest is taken care off  :2thumbs:


edit
piston number is 1276, very close to oem spec. He said there is a tall and a short piston, im getting the tall

compression ratio should be around 9.8 and 10.3 with the heads and gasket

Spec on that motor is 10:1, so we are right there. No it wont be a 8:1 motor, it will be spec'd as close to oem as possible

He just informed me that the valves in the heads are pretty beat up, and probably didnt seat well, so im having those replaced with new.

He said with what he found that car wasnt close to 10:1 when it came in.....but it still moved, so this fresh motor should be a nice improvment


c00nhunterjoe

Might want to look up that number. I think thats the low compression keith black piston. I could be wrong though.

heyoldguy


69wannabe

Quote from: Stegs on March 26, 2015, 06:28:01 AM
he told me what they are, i forgot.

he is matching pistons to the heads and doing a gasket matching

i think the pistons were something like 4283 (maybe a part number?) he told me but i have a bad memory and didnt right it down since i was driving


I know they are spec to oem pistons

total for the rebuild, using stock cam, crank, heads etc (port/polish heads), new cam bearings, new rings, gaskets, machine crank, bore the cylinders 30 over
new pistons, re-assemble and paint hemi orange was 2300

that also includes stuff like a new timing gear and chain, new oil pump (mellings) and im sure a bunch of other stuff that i forget.

The nice part about everything is this is only going to cost me about 400 out of my own pocket, the rest is taken care off  :2thumbs:


edit
piston number is 1276, very close to oem spec. He said there is a tall and a short piston, im getting the tall

compression ratio should be around 9.8 and 10.3 with the heads and gasket

Spec on that motor is 10:1, so we are right there. No it wont be a 8:1 motor, it will be spec'd as close to oem as possible

He just informed me that the valves in the heads are pretty beat up, and probably didnt seat well, so im having those replaced with new.

He said with what he found that car wasnt close to 10:1 when it came in.....but it still moved, so this fresh motor should be a nice improvment



Them 1276 are slugs and if you are doing this now is the time to stop him and tell him you would rather have the speed pro L2355F pistons!!!!! There is a big difference in a low 8 compression engine and a mid 9 compression engine. The 2355's are a replacement 6 pack piston and not the best for lightweight performance but still better than alot of the other offered pistons out there for the price. $422 at summit racing and they are forged and not cast. A HP 440 would have had forged pistons anyway and not cast pistons. We are trying to help you make the right decision while your engine is apart!!!! Take it from these guys that know mopar's myself included that them 1276's are a huge mistake for your engine!!

Challenger340

Quote from: Stegs on March 26, 2015, 06:28:01 AM
he told me what they are, i forgot.

he is matching pistons to the heads and doing a gasket matching

i think the pistons were something like 4283 (maybe a part number?) he told me but i have a bad memory and didnt right it down since i was driving


I know they are spec to oem pistons

total for the rebuild, using stock cam, crank, heads etc (port/polish heads), new cam bearings, new rings, gaskets, machine crank, bore the cylinders 30 over
new pistons, re-assemble and paint hemi orange was 2300

that also includes stuff like a new timing gear and chain, new oil pump (mellings) and im sure a bunch of other stuff that i forget.

The nice part about everything is this is only going to cost me about 400 out of my own pocket, the rest is taken care off  :2thumbs:


edit
piston number is 1276, very close to oem spec. He said there is a tall and a short piston, im getting the tall

compression ratio should be around 9.8 and 10.3 with the heads and gasket

Spec on that motor is 10:1, so we are right there. No it wont be a 8:1 motor, it will be spec'd as close to oem as possible

He just informed me that the valves in the heads are pretty beat up, and probably didnt seat well, so im having those replaced with new.

He said with what he found that car wasnt close to 10:1 when it came in.....but it still moved, so this fresh motor should be a nice improvment



This has GOTTA be a JOKE Thread right ?
STEGS,
If you allow that NUMBSKULL to stick those 1276 Pistons in a BB Mopar after all the friggín MILLIONS of warnings about THOSE Pistons on this and other forums..... then there is no helping mankind...... we are all doomed !
Just STOP OK ?


My apologies for shouting if indeed this is some kind of prank post ?
I just can't believe anyone would still use a Silvolite #1276 piston for anything but a doorstop.
Only wimps wear Bowties !

firefighter3931

68 Charger R/T "Black Pig" Street/Strip bruiser, 70 Charger R/T 440-6bbl Cruiser. Firecore ignition  authorized dealer ; contact me with your needs

Stegs

he said he is ordering the tall pistons...giving me a compression of 9.5 -10

There are 2 sizes , short and tall....im getting the tall ones for higher compression

im confused now

your telling me this is not going to give me around 10:1?

its a stock rebuild guys, just to get me buy 3-4-5 years before i do a stroker motor....


help!


Challenger340

Quote from: Stegs on March 27, 2015, 08:47:42 AM
he said he is ordering the tall pistons...giving me a compression of 9.5 -10

There are 2 sizes , short and tall....im getting the tall ones for higher compression

im confused now

your telling me this is not going to give me around 10:1?

its a stock rebuild guys, just to get me buy 3-4-5 years before i do a stroker motor....


help!



I will agree on one thing, you certainly must be confused ?
Myself, and many others on here..... have told you repeatedly NOT to allow your MORON machinist(who obviously knows nothing about Chrysler OEM Specs), NOT to use any of those "advertised" numbers for piston selection.
You will be NO WHERE NEAR 10.0:1 with either the "short" nor the "TALL" version of those Pistons.... NOT even CLOSE !

Before any of this started, I POSTED here a caution here for you.
Remember this;
Be very careful with replacement Piston selection, as it relates to the "Compression Distance" of the Pistons.
Do NOT select Pistons by "published" or "advertised" Compression ratio in Catalogs.....
rebuild the Heads FIRST,
then "CC" them for Volume when done, then apply THAT CC number with a known Head gasket like the Fel-Pro # 1009, etc. when selecting a conduscive piston "compression distance" height for your desired Compression Ratio WITH the Cam events to be used.


And now,
you are making EXACTLY the mistake I was trying to warn you about up front, wherein the "published" data on those Pistons is incorrect regarding it being anything more than an OEM smogger Engine replacement Piston.

Stegs
If you use either of those pistons , the short(#1276) or TALL(#1263), I don't care which, one is just worse than the other....
You will NOT have a "stock" O.E.M. anything other than a 230 hp TERD !
and,
You will be no where even close to 10:1 Compression ratio(maybe mid 8's at best)

You've been told, do as you wish, just like that Gump fella....

Call your idiot machinist and tell him to grow a brain !

Only wimps wear Bowties !

firefighter3931

Bob hit the nail on the head....the machinist is building you an OEM 75-76 smog motor.  :brickwall:

This will be a step backwards from your current engine combination.  :P


Ron
68 Charger R/T "Black Pig" Street/Strip bruiser, 70 Charger R/T 440-6bbl Cruiser. Firecore ignition  authorized dealer ; contact me with your needs

Challenger340

NEW DESIGN Pistons coming !

This whole WRONG Piston issue arising again..... has pissed me off !

So, I have been on the phone.
It is going to cost me.... but I am having 20-30 sets of Factory CORRECT  Cast Pistons built.

2 offerings;
* 68-70 Cast Flat Top Slugs on the 2.025" Compression distance
and
* "Correct" '68 to 70 SIX-PACK Cast Pistons, same as the L2355, but cast on the 2.055" to 2.062" Compression Distance W/4 Valve reliefs.

Seems to be a HOLE in the marketplace for a quiet running, inexpensive, CAST "correct"  Compression Ratio Pistons for 440 Mopars.
Might be good for the restoration crowd so they can restore "correct" performance on these Engines ! .... rather than " thinking" they did with some of the terds I have seen and ridden in !
Only wimps wear Bowties !

ACUDANUT

I always thought the prime years of 440's and 383's used the 906 heads ?

BSB67

Quote from: Stegs on March 27, 2015, 08:47:42 AM
he said he is ordering the tall pistons...giving me a compression of 9.5 -10

There are 2 sizes , short and tall....im getting the tall ones for higher compression

im confused now

your telling me this is not going to give me around 10:1?

its a stock rebuild guys, just to get me buy 3-4-5 years before i do a stroker motor....

help!


I think we have been helping you, you're just not listening.  You so want to believe your machinist.  Just look at the catalog and do the math yourself, and prove it to youself.  You don't have to believe anyone.

This is a budget build.  That is fine.  I get it.  You will need to make compromises.  I get it.  It's okay.  But you still need to make good decisions.  You really need to put a decent compression height piston in it.  You are buying pistons anyways.  It is a really bad decision to not buy the only right piston.

Think of it this way, if you go cheap on the heads, the cam, the intake, the carb, the exhaust, you can fix anyone of those in a weekend when your budget allows.  You put the wrong piston in that short block, it is a turd forever.  FOREVER!  

So here are the numbers.  
If you use the 1276 piston (i.e. the worst possible piston you could buy) - the compression ratio will be between 7.3:1 and 8.0:1, depending on head and gasket.  There is nothing that your machinist can reasonably do to change that.  To achieve the 8:1 ratio it will require extra head milling ($), block decking ($), and a 0.020 shim gasket.   Oh, and then your intake probably won't fit.

If you use the 1263 piston (probably the third worst piston you can buy) - the compression ratio will be between 8.0:1 and 8.9:1, depending on head and gasket.  The 8.9:1 ratio will require extra head milling ($), block decking ($), and a 0.020 shim gasket.   If your machinist tells you any different, he is simply wrong.  That begs the next question, should you really be using him????

Here is my opinion on your best budget short block buy/build:

1) Get the Sealed Power CSMHP 815 rebuild kit,
2) Find a good machine shop
3) Have the block decked to get to zero deck with the piston.

IMO, this is the best, and frankly the only budget built anyone should do.  It also provides the maximum flexibility for future upgrades.  If you cannot afford this, wait until you can.  This short block can be as a smooth and docile as an original Imperial, or can be a thumper and propel a street driven B-Body well into the 11s and make over 500 hp with simple performance bolt-ons.

You can use your factory open chamber heads on this motor and a stock cam, run pump gas, and have great performance.  You can then put on a set of closed chamber aluminum heads (several suppliers) and a rowdy cam and take your stock 300 hp 440 and turn it into 450+ hp in a weekend.




500" NA, Eddy head, pump gas, exhaust manifold with 2 1/2 exhaust with tailpipes
4150 lbs with driver, 3.23 gear, stock converter
11.68 @ 120.2 mph

BSB67

Quote from: Challenger340 on March 27, 2015, 11:10:03 AM
NEW DESIGN Pistons coming !

This whole WRONG Piston issue arising again..... has pissed me off !

So, I have been on the phone.
It is going to cost me.... but I am having 20-30 sets of Factory CORRECT  Cast Pistons built.

2 offerings;
* 68-70 Cast Flat Top Slugs on the 2.025" Compression distance
and
* "Correct" '68 to 70 SIX-PACK Cast Pistons, same as the L2355, but cast on the 2.055" to 2.062" Compression Distance W/4 Valve reliefs.

Seems to be a HOLE in the marketplace for a quiet running, inexpensive, CAST "correct"  Compression Ratio Pistons for 440 Mopars.
Might be good for the restoration crowd so they can restore "correct" performance on these Engines ! .... rather than " thinking" they did with some of the terds I have seen and ridden in !

Bob, if you are making this happen, my hat is off to you.  You are truly passionate and committed to the hobby and its enthusiasts.  :2thumbs: :2thumbs:

In my opinion, I think that there is a market out there for this type of piston.  The challenge will be to get the bone-head machine shops, like the one we are talking about on this thread, to start specing such a product.  There are just too many wrong piston product choices on the market to sift through.

Good luck!

500" NA, Eddy head, pump gas, exhaust manifold with 2 1/2 exhaust with tailpipes
4150 lbs with driver, 3.23 gear, stock converter
11.68 @ 120.2 mph

69wannabe

Stegs, listen to Bob and Ron!!! These fellow's truly know engine's inside and out!!!! I have built several 440's myself and I know the good piston number's by heart and the 2355's are my first go to pistons on any 440 that i'm putting together. I have used the keith black 237's but I really recommend the 2355's as everybody on here has highly recommended too!!! I have never even heard of them other part number's and for a good reason...

Challenger340

For the life of me, I simply can not fathom "why" any manufacturer is still building both the 1.91" C.D., nor the 1.969" C.D. Pistons for 440 Engines as factory replacement ANYTHING !
IMO, simply makes no sense.
So, I have been in contact with the manufacturer United Engine and Machine, Silvolite Tech. Dept.,
ongoing,
but very simply here, they have NO ONE still on staff who has any recollection of the old Engineering drawings of these ancient designs, etc.
or,
the reasoning "why" they are built the way they are.

Friday's conversations were put over until next week, where I will pursue it further with their Engineers, but thus far in a nutshell, it seems the supporting data for their design criterion was the old N.H.R.A. published "minimum" CC Head Chamber specifications, for both the closed and open Chamber Cylinder Heads.....Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back in the 1970's for FAWKS sakes !

Now, as background to what seems to have happened 40 odd years ago... when these garbage compression height 440 "replacement" Pistons were designed,
at about the same time....
N.H.R.A. "published" their minimum Chamber sizes as 79.5 CC's for the Open Chamber BB Mopar Heads
       and,   "            "      minimum           "      "  73.5 CC's for the Closed Chamber BB Mopar Heads

Anybody see what happened ?

Nobody bothered to make the distinction between a minimum acceptable CC Chamber Size that a racing sanctioning body(NHRA), would accept before dis-qualification
and,
the "Real World" CC Chamber sizes in production.
So it would seem,
these pistons were designed/built according to Compression Ratios that would result, but from those "inaccurate" CC sizings.

As we all know 40+ years later, most, if not all....
"open" Chamber Heads fall between 86 CC's to as high as 90 CC's as cast.
and
"closed" chambers between fall between 78 CC's to 82 CC's as cast.
Which basically makes these 1.91" and 1.96"C.D. Piston designs, very solid mid 7's to 1,  and mid 8's to 1 offerings(the so-called HIGH piston)

First step:
is to present enough valid "real world" data so the Engineers can come to the same conclusion
2.) make it substantial enough on such a low numerical old engine design, that they see the cost benefit to "updating" for whatever market sales are left (not many). Lets face it here.... just how many "stock" 440 Engines are being rebuilt these days ?

I don't think it is a big deal ? at least on one piston, the 1968 to 1970 440 piston.
"Adjusting" a CNC Piston program a little higher.... piece of Piss !
So should be fairly easy to get the old factory advertised "10:1" Compression Ratio Piston(actually around 9.6 to 9.8 with a .022" Steel Shim head gasket) which was 2.025" Compression Distance.... made by merely adjusting the 1.96" C.D. program upward about .050" to the 2.025" C.D.

A little harder....
is convincing them to make a "Cast" version of the actual 440- 6 Pack Piston(yes they were "cast" stock), basically a copy of the Forged L2355 Piston on the higher 2.062" C.D. W/4 valve reliefs.
The "carrot" for them... is that the L2355 is still a decent numerical seller, from which they could draw sales as a much lower priced alternative.

Normally, I would not recommend "cast" pistons for performance useage.... but for anyone who has held a stock BB 440 Mopar cast piston in their hand ?.... you know why they are fine for 5,500 rpm !
With the added benefit for many... is they are far more forgiving to lesser Bore & Hone Jobs accomplished devoid of a Torque Plate(seems most), and can be fit at .003" with no noise, and at 1034 grams Piston & Pin, they require no re-balancing with stock parts.

I will keep you posted..... but strange days indeed,
when it seems that it may be easier to tackle an actual "Manufacturing Company" and their "Engineers".... and convince them their "product" is flawed
than to,
try and convince one individual, after hundreds have been burned through decades, that the "product" itself is poo !
Only wimps wear Bowties !

Stegs

sorry guys, thats not what he is going with

I was talking to him on the phone while driving

He said thats what his book called for

He is going with a different number piston, to get me right up there to 9.5-10 compression

that part number i wrote down would be 8.5 to 1 "motor home" pistons (what his book called for as a standard replacement, and we are NOT going with these

ACUDANUT

Quote from: ACUDANUT on March 27, 2015, 01:36:55 PM
I always thought the prime years of 440's and 383's used the 906 heads ?

No response ?

BSB67


500" NA, Eddy head, pump gas, exhaust manifold with 2 1/2 exhaust with tailpipes
4150 lbs with driver, 3.23 gear, stock converter
11.68 @ 120.2 mph

BSB67

Quote from: Stegs on March 30, 2015, 06:13:37 AM
sorry guys, thats not what he is going with

I was talking to him on the phone while driving

He said thats what his book called for

He is going with a different number piston, to get me right up there to 9.5-10 compression

that part number i wrote down would be 8.5 to 1 "motor home" pistons (what his book called for as a standard replacement, and we are NOT going with these

What is the part number?

500" NA, Eddy head, pump gas, exhaust manifold with 2 1/2 exhaust with tailpipes
4150 lbs with driver, 3.23 gear, stock converter
11.68 @ 120.2 mph

Challenger340

Quote from: Stegs on March 30, 2015, 06:13:37 AM
sorry guys, thats not what he is going with

I was talking to him on the phone while driving

He said thats what his book called for

He is going with a different number piston, to get me right up there to 9.5-10 compression

that part number i wrote down would be 8.5 to 1 "motor home" pistons (what his book called for as a standard replacement, and we are NOT going with these

So Stegs
Could you please tell us what Piston number he is going to use ?... to get you "right up there to 9.5-10.0 compression"
Federal Mogul/Speed Pro # L2355 ?
Keith Black Hypereutectic # KB237 ?
Only wimps wear Bowties !


oestermarken

Quote from: Challenger340 on March 27, 2015, 11:10:03 AM
NEW DESIGN Pistons coming !

This whole WRONG Piston issue arising again..... has pissed me off !

So, I have been on the phone.
It is going to cost me.... but I am having 20-30 sets of Factory CORRECT  Cast Pistons built.

2 offerings;
* 68-70 Cast Flat Top Slugs on the 2.025" Compression distance
and
* "Correct" '68 to 70 SIX-PACK Cast Pistons, same as the L2355, but cast on the 2.055" to 2.062" Compression Distance W/4 Valve reliefs.

Seems to be a HOLE in the marketplace for a quiet running, inexpensive, CAST "correct"  Compression Ratio Pistons for 440 Mopars.
Might be good for the restoration crowd so they can restore "correct" performance on these Engines ! .... rather than " thinking" they did with some of the terds I have seen and ridden in !
:2thumbs: :popcrn: :2thumbs:
69 383 4bbl
White Hat Special
Light Bronze Metallic