News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Stock vs Restomod

Started by hollywood1336, January 21, 2015, 01:05:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

hollywood1336

I certainly appreciate the guys who keep their cars true to the factory original design. And I appreciate the amount of work that goes into restoring them to factory original and maintaining them.
Now that I am driving my car (and loving it), and people are seeing it, I find there are more people, young and old, who agree with the whole restomod approach I have taken with my car verses people saying I should have kept it stock, regardless of original engine. They agree that the classic body lines should remain untouched, but the convenience of the new engine, suspension and interior make the car more desirable and drivable to them. People always mention better reliability with the newer motors but I tell them that the same reliability can be achieved with the original motors. The original 318 out of my car ran like a sewing machine, issue free. Still, I find more people like the idea of a restomod than keeping it original. The young guys would love an old muscle car but don't want to deal with the nickel and dime issues and the older guys I meet love the comfort and handling the newer suspension and interior  provides. I tell all of them the same reliability and comfort can be accomplished with the stock cars but they don't seem interested.
Although not for sale, I have been offered 90k for my car, by a guy who I know has the money. But, until he shows the green it's all here say. As I have previously mentioned, I am 52k into the car and if I had to do it again without the mistakes and being much smarter, I could do it for 45k.
An original Hemi car should be kept original, a piece of history. And I know there are those who wont agree but I have seen some RT 440 cars at shows I have been to where just the suspension has been upgraded to IFS with rack and pinion and they are still worth the same or more as a stock RT 440 car.
If you put a long bow and a compound bow with fiber optics in front of Robin Hood, which would he have chosen.
This is probably a touchy subject but how many have had their cars at shows or Rallies or at the corner malt shop and had people admire them but say they would prefer the old body with modern conveniences, engine, suspension, interior etc.

SRT-440

I'm a restomod kinda guy too...I have a 6.1 in a 70 Plymouth. I have the same wheels, but was wondering what sizes are yours? Mine are 18x8 front and 18x9.5 in the rear, but don't look as big as urs. I like the low wide look but not getting it with my setup.

I noticed the SRT badge..what engine u running?

:cheers:
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog..."

2012 SRT8 392 Challenger (SOLD)
2004 Dodge Stage 1 SRT-4 (SOLD)
1970 Plymouth Road Runner Clone w/6.1 HEMI (SOLD)
1971 Dodge Dart w/440 (SOLD)
1985 Buick Grand National w/'87 swap and big turbo (SOLD)

hollywood1336

Hey SRT-440, I have the same size wheels front and back as you with 40 series tires. I also have the Bill Reilly front suspension which I slightly modified to get the lower stance. I'm running a 2001 Viper V10 with Tremc 6 speed.

SRT-440

Cool..maybe it's cuz yours is lowered.

You have an amazing car!! Good job on stuffing the V10 and 6 spd in.  :2thumbs:
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog..."

2012 SRT8 392 Challenger (SOLD)
2004 Dodge Stage 1 SRT-4 (SOLD)
1970 Plymouth Road Runner Clone w/6.1 HEMI (SOLD)
1971 Dodge Dart w/440 (SOLD)
1985 Buick Grand National w/'87 swap and big turbo (SOLD)

roger440

Did mine stock, but love the restomod thing. Figured mine should stay stock. But if id had a 318 or similar "unspecial" car, it would have been modded.
1969 Dodge Charger RT/SE
1970 Plymouth Roadrunner - SOLD
2017 HSV Maloo
2003 Holden SS Ute
1970 Triumph 2000 Estate, fitted Rover V8
1961 Standard Atlas
1980 Triumph Dolomite Sprint
1974 Triumph Stag
2003 Subaru Forester

G-man

Not sure what restomod actually entails but, from what I believe... keep the car from the outside looking like the muscle car that it is and change the insides (engine, suspension, gearbox etc) to give it modern performance/reliability.

That way you got a a very good car that looks like the original beast. Once bodies start getting played with, shaved bumpers and whatever else... they lose there 'muscle' like look and start looking more like a modern car. I always believed in doing up the inside of the car while retaining the Beast that covers it. Maybe that is what restomod is, maybe it isn't.  :shruggy:

hollywood1336

I think you hit the nail on the head. Once you mees with the original lines of the body you have entered into a completely different build. The original lines of any muscle car should remain the same, engine, suspension and interior, that's my definition as well.

G-man


Memphis Mopar

Hollywood You have an awesome Charger,  Also I love the color.  :cheers:

sixty-niner

I agree with the pro-touring movement, I see no reason to spend a ton of money to put a car to stock spec when the stock spec wasn't very good in the first place.  I hate green but your car is AMAZING!!!  I love the color.
it must be a blast to drive.
ERIK

Stegs

Quote from: hollywood1336 on January 21, 2015, 01:05:30 PM
I certainly appreciate the guys who keep their cars true to the factory original design. And I appreciate the amount of work that goes into restoring them to factory original and maintaining them.
Now that I am driving my car (and loving it), and people are seeing it, I find there are more people, young and old, who agree with the whole restomod approach I have taken with my car verses people saying I should have kept it stock, regardless of original engine. They agree that the classic body lines should remain untouched, but the convenience of the new engine, suspension and interior make the car more desirable and drivable to them. People always mention better reliability with the newer motors but I tell them that the same reliability can be achieved with the original motors. The original 318 out of my car ran like a sewing machine, issue free. Still, I find more people like the idea of a restomod than keeping it original. The young guys would love an old muscle car but don't want to deal with the nickel and dime issues and the older guys I meet love the comfort and handling the newer suspension and interior  provides. I tell all of them the same reliability and comfort can be accomplished with the stock cars but they don't seem interested.
Although not for sale, I have been offered 90k for my car, by a guy who I know has the money. But, until he shows the green it's all here say. As I have previously mentioned, I am 52k into the car and if I had to do it again without the mistakes and being much smarter, I could do it for 45k.
An original Hemi car should be kept original, a piece of history. And I know there are those who wont agree but I have seen some RT 440 cars at shows I have been to where just the suspension has been upgraded to IFS with rack and pinion and they are still worth the same or more as a stock RT 440 car.
If you put a long bow and a compound bow with fiber optics in front of Robin Hood, which would he have chosen.
This is probably a touchy subject but how many have had their cars at shows or Rallies or at the corner malt shop and had people admire them but say they would prefer the old body with modern conveniences, engine, suspension, interior etc.


exactly how i want my car to look when im done...except in R6 Red

very well done!!

Paul G

I sold my 73 Rallye 440 car because it was a low number car, only 700 ish produced. I believe it should be kept original, just my opinion. Bought my 72 to modify a little. It was a 318 column shift car. Do what you like to a run of the mill car. Again, my opinion.

The first thing people will ask, "is it original"? Original cars are great, I am glad there are those who want to preserve the originality of these cars. They are doing a service for future generations. Curator of a future museum piece. Thats not for me.

I like to modify, improve, customize, without making large changes. Keep it looking original, but not.   
1972 Charger Topper Special, 360ci, 46RH OD trans, 8 3/4 sure grip with 3.91 gear, 14.93@92 mph.
1973 Charger Rallye, 4 speed, muscle rat. Whatever engine right now?

Mopars Unlimited of Arizona

http://www.moparsaz.com/#

RIDELIKEHELL

Too each their own but I like both but modern upgrades like suspension & brakes are a few mods I made. From anyone who has been in my car says it's nothing like a 68 Charger is as far as road manners. I have the same wheels as well...beauty of a Car man!
AMD POSTER BOY

1968 CHARGER R/T  http://www.youtube.com/user/ridelikehell73

Challenger340

BTW, great looking Car, you should be proud  :2thumbs:

Agreed, do what you want according to your own tastes with the non-collectable versions.

I had a 318 1970 Charger once, and I would not have hesitated making changes to it as well.
But to be clear.... it was a completely different animal to drive anyways, from my 1969 R/T in pretty much every respect. NOT just performance, I am talking handling as well.
And just dumping a 440 into the 318 body, while improving power, would only have made the handling worse.

In the R/T Cars... things like heavier Torsion Bars, Sway Bars, heavier staggered Leaf Packs out back all made the R/T's far better/stiffer than even their 383 brethren.
Still a "truck" around town no matter..... but at highway speeds I find my R/T really quite decent, whereas my 318 car would have floated / bounced / body rolled off into the ditch above 80.... if it could get there ? 
Only wimps wear Bowties !

hollywood1336

The car handles very nice, flat around corners, possibly a little too stiff in the front so I may loosen the adjustments on the coil overs. Acceleration is brutal, engine revs at 1400 rpm at 70 in sixth gear. Had it up to 90 on the freeway and it was very solid.

chargerperson

I went with restomod on a 67 charger as the engine was not original, nor period correct and needed some work.  After driving my 2009 Challenger RT, it seemed like a good idea to upgrade the 67 as a restomod.  Going with upgraded brakes, suspension, 6 speed and 6.4L but retaining original appearance.  Lone exception for the original appearance are the tires which had to be larger to fit the brakes.

hollywood1336

Hey Chargerperson, post a picture of your 67, I'd love to see it.

Yatzee

I have been busy "retomodding" my ride but I have never done anything or tossed anything that would not allow the next owner to go back to original. I'm not saying that I have two of everything but I can't be far off.
This is my ride, my way, the way I like it (and I do) but I have a lot of respect for cars 50 years plus in age
and I've seen work done on many forums that is nothing short of bastardization of national jewels. I think
many people appreciate more modern brakes, lighting, suspensions but when it finally comes to selling the
beast, they always point out what is not original and request a lower price. Keep the spare parts and offer
them to make the car the way they want it, just like you did.

hollywood1336

I had to cut the firewall on the car to get the Viper motor in. Viper motors are about 4.75" longer than standard v8's. In doing that I had to take out the wiper motor. Customizing another wiper motor in there will be part of the tinkering phase of the car, however, this car will never see the rain. Other than that, if someone wanted to return it to stock by removing everything I have done it is possible to do.
I'm a fit and finish guy, I love seeing original stock cars where the owner has paid attention to the fit and finish under the hood. This is the motor in my car, it was important for me during the installation to keep it clean and make it look like the car came with this motor from the factory.

chargerperson

Quote from: hollywood1336 on January 22, 2015, 12:13:32 PM
Hey Chargerperson, post a picture of your 67, I'd love to see it.

Hollywood
Car is still a work in progress but should be done in 8-9 weeks.  I have car in restoration shop as work is beyond my skills.  Car has some sentimental value so I decided to go with a nice comprehensive restomod restoration.  Not very user friendly but a bunch of pictures are at the below link - select "show more" and there are a lot of pictures - perhaps a few too many sheetmetal pics but gets better at the end.

Other than engine compartment, paint job is not yet wet sanded so it will look better.

http://www.premierrestony.com/#!67-charger/c1mb7  have to copy and paste link as it will default to main page otherwise

Also attached a few of the pictures I took on Monday - had to compress them for size limit....sorry they are so small

1965gp

I love the look of the resto mod cars. I agree that keeping the original lines is important, but the subtle body mods that people walk by and have to ask if it's factory are very cool. I have upgraded the wheels/stance/brakes with a resto mod look on several of my cars but haven't taken the plunge for a modern motor yet. I don't really need it as most of my cars are now used for taking the kids to school or family outings. I kind of had my fill with drag racing and never really caught the Autocross bug.

If I was building one car - it would be done exactly like yours (but orange with a flag on the roof) - very nicely done.

el dub

This is probably a touchy subject but how many have had their cars at shows or Rallies or at the corner malt shop and had people admire them but say they would prefer the old body with modern conveniences, engine, suspension, interior etc.

No one has really said that to me. Its more like what color is that, who painted it, how much hp. whats it worth, stuff like that.  just car guys talk. motor, whatever, you know. Your car is sweet. I painted mine the same color I think. People like that color, that's for sure. To me your car is a resto mod. which I think is a car restored with a modded drive train, engine, tranny, rear end. When you start doing trick interiors and modded body like shaved handles, this is custom work or a custom car. Just my 2 cents. correct if wrong.
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

G-man

When you don't care about what other people say but how you feel driving the car then modern upgrades, oldschool body is definitely the best.

I mean who 'really' wants to drive a car that you stink in because it has no air-con, who 'really' wants a car that you have to press the brake real hard and HOPE it stops before you run into someone, who 'really' likes to drive in a muscle car that turns like a boat around corners and who 'really' want's a car that is no faster than mums new grocery sedan?

I mean, sure that is what we 'drive' (as I just described a stock Charger) but in reality, if money was not an issue etc, im pretty sure everyone sane would rather better brakes and modern performance over rubbish ones. Thats how people are. We spend to have better, not worse. So if the option was there, im pretty sure we would all have a good performing/stopping charger.

Of course, not everyone is sane and some would rather say "But I rather have crap brakes" "I rather have rubbish suspension"... we cant help these people.  :pity:

Mike DC

QuoteI mean who 'really' wants to drive a car that you stink in because it has no air-con, who 'really' wants a car that you have to press the brake real hard and HOPE it stops before you run into someone, who 'really' likes to drive in a muscle car that turns like a boat around corners and who 'really' want's a car that is no faster than mums new grocery sedan?

I mean, sure that is what we 'drive' (as I just described a stock Charger) but in reality, if money was not an issue etc, im pretty sure everyone sane would rather better brakes and modern performance over rubbish ones. Thats how people are. We spend to have better, not worse. So if the option was there, im pretty sure we would all have a good performing/stopping charger.

If that was true then there wouldn't be nearly as much money invested in stock/stockish restorations.  LOTS of people spend equal or greater money as it would take to make upgrades just fixing up the stock parts (knowingly).  Some are worried about resale, others like the idea of a stock resto, but quite a few have simply grown to love these cars for their quirks, the good and the bad. 

 

Ghoste

Quote from: G-man on January 24, 2015, 12:30:12 AM
When you don't care about what other people say but how you feel driving the car then modern upgrades, oldschool body is definitely the best.

I mean who 'really' wants to drive a car that you stink in because it has no air-con, who 'really' wants a car that you have to press the brake real hard and HOPE it stops before you run into someone, who 'really' likes to drive in a muscle car that turns like a boat around corners and who 'really' want's a car that is no faster than mums new grocery sedan?

I mean, sure that is what we 'drive' (as I just described a stock Charger) but in reality, if money was not an issue etc, im pretty sure everyone sane would rather better brakes and modern performance over rubbish ones. Thats how people are. We spend to have better, not worse. So if the option was there, im pretty sure we would all have a good performing/stopping charger.

Of course, not everyone is sane and some would rather say "But I rather have crap brakes" "I rather have rubbish suspension"... we cant help these people.  :pity:

I guess I'm one of those people then but don't worry about not being able to "help" me, I don't need or want it.