News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Is this a good 440

Started by Bob, January 16, 2015, 04:24:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bob

I believe the stamp is 5t440ehp.
Does this look right?

5=1975 model year
T=Trenton engine plant
440 cubic inches
E= cast crank
HP= HP version

Thanks

Ghoste

Personally I'd rather have a forged crank.

Nacho-RT74

well Bob... after 72, there is nothing fancy on engines. Just first ones got forged. And Magnum setup began to be more toward to standard. ( camshaft wasn't anymore the HP one since 74 I think )

HP on that one is maybe just the windage tray, HP manifolds, valve springs with dampener... and MAYBE double timming chain setup. ( although my 400 got single )
Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

Bob

Thanks.

It's something on C/List for about 250 bucks.

6spd68

If you're going to scrap the internals, and build up from there; that's not so bad I'd think?
Every great legend has it's humble beginning.
Project 668:
1968 Dodge Charger (318 Car)
Projected Driveline:
383 with mild stroke
Carb intake w/Holley 750 VS

6-Speed Dodge Viper Transmission

Fully rebuilt Dana-60 w/Motive gears. 3.55 Posi, Yukon axles.

Finished in triple black. 

ETA: "Some velvet morning, when I'm straight..."

Ghoste

Yeah, a stroker crank and on up from there.

hatersaurusrex

For 250 I'd get it - I think Jasper gives more than that for a useable 440 core these days.
[ŌŌ]ƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖ[ŌŌ] = 68
[ŌŌ][ƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖ][ƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖ][ŌŌ] = 69
(ŌŌ)[ƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗ](ŌŌ) = 70

chargerbr549

The 75 block has some of the best upgrades they did to the 440 (not counting the internals)over the years until I believe 76 and later they reduced the nickle content of the block, regardless of year they should be sonic tested before going oversize on the bores.

Here is a good read on big block chrysler blocks.

http://www.440source.com/blockinfo.htm

500Jon

All 440's are good!!!

If its a low mileage motor, its a GIFT!!!
Cast crank is fine, even for mild racing.
Low compression 440's will always get you where you wanna go! :rofl:

If its for racing then a stroker kit is the best bet!!! :cheers:
IF A JOB's WORTH DOING, ITS WORTH DOING WELL, RIP DAD.
4-SPEED, 1969 Charger-500 is the most Coolio car in the World!

Bob


500Jon

For your information...

You can put a steel crank in any 440 block, but you can't put a cast crank in a pre 73 block...
Clear as mud, its all to do with thrust flange sizes, on the centre bearings...
IF A JOB's WORTH DOING, ITS WORTH DOING WELL, RIP DAD.
4-SPEED, 1969 Charger-500 is the most Coolio car in the World!

Ponch ®

Quote from: Ghoste on January 16, 2015, 04:31:04 PM
Personally I'd rather have a forged crank.

And I'd rather have Ariana Grande sitting on my lap naked feeding me grapes as I type this...but that's not an option. So you make do.

I say at that price, its worth it.
"I spent most of my money on cars, birds, and booze. The rest I squandered." - George Best

Chrysler Performance West

John_Kunkel

Quote from: 500Jon on January 21, 2015, 10:57:33 AM
For your information...

You can put a steel crank in any 440 block, but you can't put a cast crank in a pre 73 block...
Clear as mud, its all to do with thrust flange sizes, on the centre bearings...

The block thrust bearing configuration doesn't prevent interchangeability of cranks but it will prevent interchanging some bearings. Just because the '74-later blocks are machined for the wider-face thrust bearing doesn't mean you have to use that bearing.
Pardon me but my karma just ran over your dogma.