2015 Challenger pictures !

[Kern Dog]

http://www.ontariostreetcar.com/

I LOVE it!

The Grille has the 1971 style twin loops. The fascia looks to be more rounded. The headlights are differeent and the hood was restyled.
Looking at the rear, the taillights are LED and reshaped. Note that the taillight area is now sloped. The bottom edges are dark colored which makes the bumper fascia seem smaller.
Looks like a winner to me.

[JB400]

I like the rear end treatment, but I can see in the front where they shortened it.  Makes the front end look more stubby looking.  Windshield is sloped too far back, but if it produces enough aero advantage, I'll accept it.

Overall, not a bad looking car.  I'd drive it

[RallyeMike]

It still looks bloated (and IS on the scale). I wish they would start over on it's own platform. How long do we have to wait for the next generation? It's ok right now, but it could be so much better.

[odcics2]

Wait for the real one today....   

[Road Dog]

Don't like they put the smiley on that. The frown looks more menacing.

[RIDELIKEHELL]

i LIKE IT!

[Mytur Binsdirti]

It's about time they did a face lift. Not bad at all.

[bill440rt]

Redesign is a throwback to the '71 Challenger.

i LIKE IT!

x2!!! 

[J.Bond]

Nice job

Scroll down the page, and they have enlarged the Dart.

[4cruzin]

Still no convertible?   

[DAY CLONA]

They can pull all the styling cues they want out of the proverbial hat, but until they let the air out of that bloated carcass they're attached to, the car still has the appearance of a Macy's Day parade  balloon

[Dino]

They can pull all the styling cues they want out of the proverbial hat, but until they let the air out of that bloated carcass they're attached to, the car still has the appearance of a Macy's Day parade  balloon

Now that's a bit harsh don't you think?  There are some very nice balloons in the Macy's parade.   

[69charger2002]

Well I'll say first off that I like the current version challenger better, maybe because i like the 70 challenger best. BUT i will say it's nice that they didn't change the car too much, as it now gives fans of 71-74 challengers something to get excited about. Definitely looks like a 71 grill and 72-74 taillight panel. Interior looks much better too. If they would have done something similar with the charger in 06 and update in 2011 to replicate 2 gens of old chargers we would be in heaven. So the challenger is a little bloated, I still commend Dodge because they were the only manufacturer with balls enough to actually build an almost clone car of the 70-74 challenger looks wise. Camaro and mustang didn't take it as far as Dodge. We complained and complained since what 1999? with the concept charger for a rear wheel drive 2 door muscle car. Now it has a HEMI with more power than the old ones, the look of the old ones, with all the modern creature comforts. It's as close to perfect in this day and age as a manufacturer will get building us a retro car. Ask any current challenger owner if they love their car, and 9 out of 10 will say ABSOLUTELY.  

[Ghoste]

You are 100% right Trav.

[Indygenerallee]

Looks great love they made it look like a 71 (best looking Challenger made) but I don't care for the front lower bumper opening bulging out...

[Mytur Binsdirti]

Still no convertible?   

Of course there are aftermarket companies who will give your car the saws-all treatment & while I think the new Challengers look great with the top down, they are damn fugly with the top up. The roofline is just plain weird.

[ODZKing]

Similar to the prototype back in 06

[6spd68]

Shame the Charger is still a fugly Chrysler 300 

[wingcar]

I like what they did for 2015...they kept the Challenger true to the original while still giving it its own look.   I can just hear it now from many who are complaining today when this platform goes away....I miss the old Challenger, Dodge ruined it.  Please, we are lucky Dodge even brought back the Challenger as a 2-door.  I for one thank them for that.  As for size and weight which seems to be the one area many continue to complain about....wake up...it's 2014, not 1970.  People's tastes have changed and you would be hard pressed to sell a lot of stripped down non-AC, non-power Challengers in today's world.   AND, even with all the extra weight they still perform better than most of the original musclecars.  If only Kowalski had been driving a new Challenger instead of a 1970 model...he wouldn't have been in such a hurry, and there wouldn't have been a couple of bulldozers waiting for him! 

[SRT-440]

They aren't anouncing the SRT version just yet...next month I think. The 392 will now be a RT option...so...the SRT "should" have the Supercharged Hemi and maybe a bit lighter...prolly too expensive.

I have a '12 SRT...it's big and heavy...but it still has no probs with the lighter cars..since it's laying down 410-420 to the wheels and the others (minus GT500) are around 350-360. I can't complain about running in the 12's stock. 

[6spd68]

Of course there are aftermarket companies who will give your car the saws-all treatment & while I think the new Challengers look great with the top down, they are damn fugly with the top up. The roofline is just plain weird.

Memories of the fox body Mustangs 

[odcics2]

They aren't anouncing the SRT version just yet...next month I think. The 392 will now be a RT option...so...the SRT "should" have the Supercharged Hemi and maybe a bit lighter...prolly too expensive.

I have a '12 SRT...it's big and heavy...but it still has no probs with the lighter cars..since it's laying down 410-420 to the wheels and the others (minus GT500) are around 350-360. I can't complain about running in the 12's stock. 

2015 Challenger with the Scat Pack option will run mid 12s - all stock!!   Not even an SRT, too!!   

Look for 11s with the '15 SRT!!   

[Ghoste]

Hard to bitch about that.

[odcics2]

Check out this option!!   

[Charger_Dart]

I really enjoy my Challenger, but the big girl needed a little more giddy-up-n-go go I added a little boost. What a blast to drive