727 trans number decode ? OK I found it, Thx to all for the help !

[Challenger340]

Does anyone here know how to decode the numbers stamped on the side of a 727 Automatic Transmission ?
As to what it originally came from etc. ?

PK2892099L  2664

update
Wiped stuff off better, put better glasses on, found the full VIN stamped on the 727 pass side on the bell housing "XS29L9B******", so it is the original Trans to the Charger 
Still a little confused on the 2892099, because the last digit still looks like a "9 to me ? but it could be a "3" as it is very lightly stamped ?, and the 2664 on the 10,000 day calendar jives on Nov 12 1968, as just 10 days before the car was produced on Nov 22 1968.

[Challenger340]

My number is not on here ?
http://www.mymopar.com/downloads/transguide.pdf

[Alaskan_TA]

The partial VIN on it if it has one will tell you more.

[Challenger340]

So can anybody help me out ?

I found the 727 Trans decode number sheet... THANKS to John Kunkel on here , but my Trans number isn't listed ?

Mine is 2892099..... instead of what it is supposed to be which is 2892093. NOT a typo... the last digit is a 9 ??
Any ideas here ?

[ACUDANUT]

I did not think the transmissions were stamped with the VIN 

[Challenger340]

I did not think the transmissions were stamped with the VIN 

No, that's not the VIN... that is the Trans application/part number stamped on the side of the trans just above the pan, drs side.

[Alaskan_TA]

Transmission VIN stamps started during the 1968 model year.

[Challenger340]

Transmission VIN stamps started during the 1968 model year.

Mine does not have the VIN stamped... just the PK2892099 number ??... which according to this list should be 2892093 for a '69 440 375hp Engine, and "PK" being the Kokomo Plant.
http://www.mymopar.com/downloads/transguide.pdf

Just behind that is a 4 digit # "2664", which I was able to figure out is a 10,000 day calendar date I think ? or Tuesday, November 12th 1968 ?
That jives...  
The Car was born Nov 22 1968 according to the Fender Tag. Just dunno about the "9" last digit instead of the "3" ?

[69CoronetRT]

A car with an SPD of 11/68 should have a VIN on the transmission and probably the whole VIN.
Are you sure there is no VIN on the pad on the passenger's side?

[Mikesmoparperformance]

So a 66 car won't have a number on the transmission?

[fy469rtse]

Waiting for John to chime in , he helped identify mine, look further through the list, it could be out of another body type,
John helped by that number and found the transmission I have is out of a C body , ? What's the chance something failed and a repaired unit was installed to get the owner going again, think of the delays if they waited to pull apart the numbers matching unit and then repair and reinstall , so chances of having your original unit only if it was never pulled for repair

[Ghoste]

So a 66 car won't have a number on the transmission?

Not a VIN.

[hemigeno]

That 2892099 number is not listed (in 1969 anyway) on any of the engineering graphics or the 69/70-71 Parts Books for any A/B/C/Y -body applications, even considering the occasional running model year change.  Since it appears to be a 1969-model transmission, it could be out of a truck (I don't have any part number info on '69 trucks) -- or it could be simply a mis-stamped part number... 

I agree with 69CoronetRT - the assembly date puts it in a timeframe when the entire VIN should have been stamped on the transmissions rail, so that should help with figuring out the application.

[Challenger340]

OK, so I should look for a VIN Number with a '69 Trans on the passenger side of the 727 apparently ? up by the non machined pad on the Bell Housing ?
That's what I found elsewhere on the internet... that the VIN is stamped on the passenger side, NOT the drivers side.

I'll look today, and then re-check my last digit again on the drivers side as well.

Pretty much everything 289209* is 1969 BB, and the 2664 date jives just 10 days before production, so I can't see it being anything but original ? Engines never been out of the Car, Exhaust System is factory original untouched, and it sure doesn't "look" like the trans has ever been pulled... but one never knows I guess ?

[John_Kunkel]

The last 9 in the part number has gotta be a mis-stamp, happened sometimes.

[hemigeno]

update
Wiped stuff off better, put better glasses on, found the full VIN stamped on the 727 pass side on the bell housing "XS29L9B******", so it is the original Trans to the Charger 
Still a little confused on the 2892099, because the last digit still looks like a "9 to me ? but it could be a "3" as it is very lightly stamped ?, and the 2664 on the 10,000 day calendar jives on Nov 12 1968, as just 10 days before the car was produced on Nov 22 1968.

[69CoronetRT]

update
Wiped stuff off better, put better glasses on, found the full VIN stamped on the 727 pass side on the bell housing "XS29L9B******", so it is the original Trans to the Charger 
Still a little confused on the 2892099, because the last digit still looks like a "9 to me ? but it could be a "3" as it is very lightly stamped ?, and the 2664 on the 10,000 day calendar jives on Nov 12 1968, as just 10 days before the car was produced on Nov 22 1968.