News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

68. Charger with 3 speed

Started by moparsal, January 20, 2014, 03:48:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

moparsal

Just picked up a 68 charger with a 3 speed 318 column shift, there's no fender tag to run numbers,
Tried to find info in my red book ,nothing , guy said it's all original , I've had a 3 speed 318 floor shift,
There no power brake or steering or a.c.
Also the book said any 68 hemi 4 speed car built after June 1. 1968 were built with exposed headlights,flush grill
And chrome reveal windshield moldings.
Any one have any info on either one of these cars?
Thanks,
Sal in n.y.

Troy

The book is wrong.

Interesting about the column shift. There are very few 3-speed 68 Chargers and I always assumed they were floor shift. I have not seen one in person that I can recall.

That comment about the flush grill, exposed headlights, and A pillar mouldings is a in reference to the 1969 Charger 500. I believe that there was a factory memo stating that they would all be equipped with a Hemi (to meet homologation rules) but that wasn't the case. They would have been based on a Charger R/T but that requirement somehow got turned around.

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

Ghoste

I don't think I've seen any 3 speed 68 or 69 Chargers that WEREN'T column shift. (had one of the 69 ones once)

Chad L. Magee

You will not find production numbers on 1968 Dodge Chargers with the 318 and three on the tree manual transmission.  That data was lost years ago (likely in the fire).  However, I can tell you that probably less than 100 Chargers were built that way.  There may be 15 to 25 of them left in any condition, but that is my best guess.  It is more common to find 1968 Chargers with the /6 and that transmission than with the 318.  It is a rare Charger that should be restored by someone who cares about the numbers.... 

The reason why I know this information is because I used to own one.  Mine was yellow, black vinyl top and gold interior.  It was sitting since 1975 (still had the 1975 tag on it) out in a farm field.  The rear quarters, floors and some of the top was holey with rust.  Cows had rubbed up and down on the sides of the car over the years, so it was pretty dented in places.  But, the grill was almost as mint as I have ever found them.  (The guy I bought it from purchased it in a group of cars as a package deal.  He was after the 1958 Chevy Impala convertible (rough) project that was a 348 tri carb, 4-speed car.  The third car in the group was a baby blue 1955 Ford Thunderbird.)  When I bought the 1968 318 three on the tree Charger, the entire interior was missing, as was the transmission.  I registered it with TDC and Wayne clued me into how rare they are.  I wanted to keep it, but after grad school, I had to make painful decisions about thinning the herd at that time due to $ and storage issues.  It just was not oddball enough to become a keeper in my collection of many projects, so I traded it off to a better home....
Ph.D. Metallocene Chemist......

Chad L. Magee

Quote from: moparsal on January 20, 2014, 03:48:36 PM
Just picked up a 68 charger with a 3 speed 318 column shift, there's no fender tag to run numbers,
Tried to find info in my red book ,nothing , guy said it's all original , I've had a 3 speed 318 floor shift,
There no power brake or steering or a.c.
Also the book said any 68 hemi 4 speed car built after June 1. 1968 were built with exposed headlights,flush grill
And chrome reveal windshield moldings.
Any one have any info on either one of these cars?
Thanks,
Sal in n.y.

Sal - I think the reference to the data on the hemi 4-speed Chargers was referencing the Charger 500 models.  That makes sense with the exposed headlights, flush grill (from a coronet 500) and the chrome reveal windshield moldings, all part of the aerodynamic 500 package (including the rear window plug).  Granted, not all 1969 Charger 500 models were hemi cars, most were 440-4bbls.  They were built as 1969 model year Chargers, but were actually built during the last parts of the 1968 model year.  These were the ones first used in NASCAR, that became the basis for the Daytonas to come later on in the production year.  I know that there are members who have far more knowledge in the winged car areas, so I will let them chime in if I am incorrect on this assumption on my part....
Ph.D. Metallocene Chemist......

Ghoste

Yes, and Troy was correct in that the first factory literature coming out of Chrysler regarding the 500 stated they would all be Hemi powered but that changed by the time of actual production.

A383Wing

GG's book says there are only 3 of the 1968 318-3spd manual trans cars known to exist......but he's been known to be wrong before

Chad L. Magee

Quote from: Ghoste on January 20, 2014, 08:06:31 PM
Yes, and Troy was correct in that the first factory literature coming out of Chrysler regarding the 500 stated they would all be Hemi powered but that changed by the time of actual production.

Thanks for the reply, I totally missed Troy's post above on the 500 information.  My bad. :icon_smile_dissapprove:...
Ph.D. Metallocene Chemist......

Chad L. Magee

Quote from: A383Wing on January 20, 2014, 08:13:09 PM
GG's book says there are only 3 of the 1968 318-3spd manual trans cars known to exist......but he's been known to be wrong before

I can tell you GG is off on it, unless you only count the ones GG knows about.  If that is the case, GG may be technically correct, but it is not very accurate calculation of them existing.  TDC knew about more of them than that GG amount at the time I traded my car off (early 2009), but I do not have the letter handy right now to list the specific details.  The letter Wayne sent to me included my car into the known TDC total.  I even talked to a fellow Charger owner up in South Dakota that had bought two of them in 2008 and I clued him into what he had.  Those were cars that were not in the TDC at the time and very unlikely known by GG at the time either....
Ph.D. Metallocene Chemist......

ws23rt

Quote from: A383Wing on January 20, 2014, 08:13:09 PM
GG's book says there are only 3 of the 1968 318-3spd manual trans cars known to exist......but he's been known to be wrong before

I like the fact that the records were lost and that only 3 are known (by GG).  It adds some fun and adventure to the hobby. :2thumbs:

So will there be a day when a 318 3 on the tree will bring hemi money? :shruggy:   Rare does have a funny affect on some.

fy469rtse

 :popcrn: :popcrn: :popcrn:   pictures please ,
its an unwritten requirement to this site , good condition , low option car read blank canvas you get to build it how you want

Ghoste

Bring Hemi money?  No, they might be rare but they lack the Hemi mystique.

A383Wing

Quote from: Ghoste on January 20, 2014, 09:07:27 PM
Bring Hemi money?  No, they might be rare but they lack the Hemi mystique.

but restored as original, put that 3spd car next to a Hemi car and I bet the little 318 car will get more looks....even more if it's a slant six car

Ghoste

I don't know.  It might get more comments but stop every one of thsoe guys raving about and ask them which of the two they want to own.

ws23rt

Hemi has a mystique that always draws attention.

When I am walking the rows at a car show my eyes tend to glaze over a bit at one after another nicely optioned muscle car.  But when something odd catches my eye I tend to dwell on it. And I see many other do the same thing.

I've been into motorcycles since age 14 and Harley's haven't been part of my world because every one else has one.  I like something different.

If by the the remotest chance a 383 or 440 were documented to be a 3sp car to me it would be gold.

The fact that 3sp's are very rare is a source of good fun.  So if a floor shift 3sp car were to be found?  Hmmm :cheers:

So owning something for resale is not the same as owning something for the fun factor. That is why many scratch their heads at some of the things we want. :Twocents:

A383Wing

Quote from: Ghoste on January 20, 2014, 09:11:22 PM
I don't know.  It might get more comments but stop every one of thsoe guys raving about and ask them which of the two they want to own.

I know which one I would own of the two....

not the Hemi

moparsal

The only thing is the fender tag is missing, what other way is there to document ?
No build sheet ether , still has the peddles , column & buddy seat brackets ,
I have a guy looking to buy & making it a hemi clone,
Thanks guys  for all the input,
Sal

A383Wing

I say let him find something else and make a clone out of that...granted, this car will never bring the money, but you would have something unique to show

my opinion

dyslexic teddybear

Quote from: A383Wing on January 20, 2014, 11:58:32 PM
I say let him find something else and make a clone out of that...granted, this car will never bring the money, but you would have something unique to show

my opinion


:iagree:

My opinion also. Just another Hemi clone doesn't appeal to me like it once did. Money doesn't mean anything to me in the sense I wouldn't be doing it to make money, I know you can't get out of it what you put in.....so no worries about it's worth.

I've have always liked the unique and different, as I get older I like them even more. I have other ideas on something to slide a hemi into.....and I think it'd be a blast to drive a three/tree car around.

Ghoste

Quote from: A383Wing on January 20, 2014, 09:53:30 PM
Quote from: Ghoste on January 20, 2014, 09:11:22 PM
I don't know.  It might get more comments but stop every one of those guys raving about and ask them which of the two they want to own.

I know which one I would own of the two....

not the Hemi


If you had your choice between the two, you would take the 318 car?  Even if they were free?
More power to you Bryan, I predict you would get more comments at the show but be part an extraordinarily tiny group. 

Chad L. Magee

Charger owners are just as varied as their cars.  Some want power, power, Power! (ie. Hemi)  Some just want to blend into a group.  Some want to stand out in one way or another.  This car falls into the last group...

The key to all of this is that the Charger in question qualifies as an "oddball", one so querky that people will stop and look at it eventhough it does not have a hemi in it.  Attention at car shows is part of the game.  If your car can attract more attention (in a good way) than other cars, it can help it stand out among the sea of other cars and may lead to a slight avantage (if all else is equal) in the general population judging contests.  At the Mopar nationals, that car would probably do well because it would be a car many would  :scratchchin: when looking at it, as they have never seen one like it.  Hey, I had someone pull out a GG white book on my 1970 Charger /6 three on the tree manual (that I took to a local rod run), they just could not believe that they actually were produced from the factory that way.  That is part of the fun of showing these cars....

If you are just considering the value aspects between a Hemi Charger of that year and this car, the Hemi wins every time.  However, someday I think the querky ones will come into their own.  They may not ever be as valuable as a 426 Hemi Charger, but they will be more like an RT in value someday.  I feel that it deserves to be documented as what it is (photos) and restored back to original by someone, but that is just my opinion....  
Ph.D. Metallocene Chemist......

Ghoste

I totally agree with that Chad and I'm glad it's that way.  My point was that even though the one may draw more comments for its oddity, the other is more desirable.  If they were both the same price I say far far far more would choose the Hemi.  Thats why the incredibly more expensive Hemi outsold the 318 three speed manual trans car in the first place.  And thats why the Hemi is grotesquely more money than any 318 Charger today.
Just my opinion though.

A383Wing

Quote from: Ghoste on January 21, 2014, 07:53:11 AM
Quote from: A383Wing on January 20, 2014, 09:53:30 PM
Quote from: Ghoste on January 20, 2014, 09:11:22 PM
I don't know.  It might get more comments but stop every one of those guys raving about and ask them which of the two they want to own.

I know which one I would own of the two....

not the Hemi


If you had your choice between the two, you would take the 318 car?  Even if they were free?
More power to you Bryan, I predict you would get more comments at the show but be part an extraordinarily tiny group.  

yes, and already am part of a tiny group here

dyslexic teddybear

Takes a special breed to stand against the tide and go for the odd and unique. :lol: :coolgleamA:


Seriously, 20 years ago I would not had believed that hemis could be so commonplace[relatively] that anyone would think "just another hemi clone".

Value-of course the hemi outdoes, but if you don't plan to sell.....to me it's not a big factor.

At a small local show last August, a 73 Barracuda with a hemi, got almost no attention. People gave it a glance and walked by. Just another hemi clone.

A friend of a friends J10 Jeep pickup, restored to stock 4X4.....got 10x the attention it seemed. Seen similar at bigger shows too.....maybe we are getting bit jaded......

It's not that I don't want a hemi clone, I do....but I wouldn't sacrifice something unique to do it.

Ghoste

So if you weren't planning to sell and they were both offered to you at the same price, maybe even free, which one would you pick?