News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

I have a date Jan. 19....

Started by 1974dodgecharger, January 01, 2014, 02:02:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

1974dodgecharger

with a dyno machine lol!!!!  I hope my 383 gives me 300 to 350HP that day since she built we predicted 400 to 450 to the fly based on the products we picked, but never dynoed her. 

Pual G will be there since I just joined the Arizona Mopar club so he can laugh at my pulls that day with the 4 speeder going at it.  CANT WAIT!!!!

no more guessing or predicting my HP/TQ anymore!

Bob T

Good, something to look forward to for sure. I did mine yesterday, glad I did it too, finally sorted some issues with it, there's a thread up in engine /performance and a link to a clip, man it sounded good  :2thumbs:
Ended up with 281rwhp 353 torque


http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,107245.0.html
Old Dog, Old Tricks.

1974dodgecharger

just saw that bob and listened to the youtube video WOW!!!  Cant wait for mine..I never done one before so im pretty excited!!!!!

Bob T

Quote from: 1974dodgecharger on January 01, 2014, 02:52:54 AM
just saw that bob and listened to the youtube video WOW!!!  Cant wait for mine..I never done one before so im pretty excited!!!!!

Yah, turn the speakers up!!!!  :punkrocka:

The big thing was sorting out all the little niggles and getting the engine to make all the power it could ( conservatively ), nothing more annoying than knowing the car should run better but does'nt and a dyno is the only real time effect to dianostically tune with that a static tune cant, money well spent in my book.

Maybe it will even get better mileage  :smilielol: , probably not though, 'cause I'm mashing the pedal a lot more  :icon_smile_big:
Old Dog, Old Tricks.

tan top

Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

fy469rtse

Bob , what percentage do you think you lost through drive line, have done mine on a engine dyno, got impressive numbers, rest of drive line built the same, but I keep hearing its about 15% , do you think that's on the money

resq302

Back sometime around 2002 or so I had my 383 HP 4 bbl (factory rated at 335 hp) chasis dyno'd and the engine is a restoration cam, .30 over pistons, going through a 4 spd manual trans and at the time 3.23 gears in the rear.  I dyno'd 230 at the rear wheels which the guy said is about right.  Typically he said you lose about 100 hp through the drive train, especially with a manual gear box.
Brian
1969 Dodge Charger (factory 4 speed, H code 383 engine,  AACA Senior winner, 2008 Concours d'Elegance participant, 2009 Concours d'Elegance award winner)
1970 Challenger Convert. factory #'s matching red inter. w/ white body.  318 car built 9/28/69 (AACA Senior winner)
1969 Plymough GTX convertible - original sheet metal, #'s matching drivetrain, T3 Honey Bronze, 1 of 701 produced, 1 of 362 with 440 4 bbl - auto

Ghoste

Shouldn't there be greater loss with an automatic?

A383Wing

yea....I have always heard greater loss with auto trans

Bob T

Quote from: fy469rtse on January 01, 2014, 08:12:01 AM
Bob , what percentage do you think you lost through drive line, have done mine on a engine dyno, got impressive numbers, rest of drive line built the same, but I keep hearing its about 15% , do you think that's on the money

I'd heard the 20% is likely ballpark for losses FY, but also its taking more hp loss to get past the further up the curve. Constant ratio losses? I'm not so sure now. On the printout I've got off the Dynojet Research machine, it shows at 5120 rpm the losses are 168hp, this is 40% of the 420 crank hp, a lot more than I would have guessed.

I reckon the losses could also be minimized a bit, for example, if I changed out my 15 x 10 295/50 magnums/bfg's to my buddys 15 x 8 aero alloys then straight away there is a rolling mass inertia saving, maybe harder tyre pressure as well.
Old Dog, Old Tricks.